Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), small businesses and individuals will be offered “robust” coverage and “affordable” premiums on the soon-to-be-running health insurance exchanges.
By grouping together these two traditionally under-served populations, the risk pool will become large enough (theoretically) to allow everyone (most notably those with pre-existing conditions) access to health insurance, and will help keep premiums affordable (again, theoretically).
But there is a problem: small businesses are jumping … read on
For the last 15 years, my family has purchased an individual health insurance policy. Individual plans, as opposed to employer-based insurance, usually don’t cover vision. We could buy a separate vision policy, but in an average year the premiums would cost more than our annual eye exams, glasses and contacts combined.
Even Medicare doesn’t pay for routine eye exams and corrective lenses, except one pair after cataract surgery.
Last fall I blogged about an inherent unfairness in our health insurance system. (I know, there’s more than one.) In short, those with employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) generally have lower premiums, lower out-of-pocket costs, and better coverage than those of us that buy health insurance through the individual market.
With the new insurance exchanges, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is supposed to decrease costs and improve coverage. Because of the law’s … read on
I posted a couple weeks ago that health insurance companies wanted to increase the penalty I mean tax on people who ignored the individual coverage mandate. The companies fear the penalty tax, only $95 the first year, is not stiff enough.
Well, according to recently released information from the IRS and the Department of Health and Human Services (overseers of the health law), the insurance companies have cause for worry. … read on
Starting in 2014, one of the signature features of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will be implemented: No adult with a pre-existing condition can be denied health insurance.
But it seems from recent news reports that both the administration and the nation’s health insurance carriers are getting a little nervous about exactly how much that will cost and whether sufficient funds will be available.
In theory, the individual mandate ensures … read on
I read with concern yesterday that one of the victims of the recent fiscal cliff deal was the program funding the creation of new non-profit health insurance carriers. Consumer Operated and Oriented Plans, CO-OPs for short, were meant to provide some much-needed competition to the private carriers on the health insurance exchanges and keep premiums more affordable.
At least, that was the theory.
But now Congress has sliced the program’s … read on
My family does not have an employer-provided health plan, and we live in a state that will set up a state-run health insurance exchange, so I wanted to learn more about the exchanges and proposed subsidies.
Several recent articles have warned of “sticker shock.” Beginning in 2014, state exchanges must offer plans that cover all “essential health benefits” as defined by the government. In other words, there will … read on
Last night I dreamt that my husband was diagnosed with metastatic melanoma.
He was lying on an exam table for some reason when the nurse spied a large, red spot on his head (he’s not bald, but in my dream he was!) and said “Oh my, that doesn’t look too good.” The doctor then looked and said “It’s a melanoma. I’ll take it off.”
Immediately the doctor excised the melanoma … read on